
βOn April 22, 2025, the Supreme Court of India criticized the Andhra Pradesh government for defying a High Court order related to the development of Amaravati as the state’s capital. The apex court emphasized that no individual or authority is above the law and expressed concern over the state’s non-compliance with judicial directives. The court had previously stayed the High Court’s directive to develop Amaravati within six months, highlighting the importance of adhering to the principle of separation of powers and cautioning against judicial overreach.
This development is part of an ongoing legal dispute concerning the Andhra Pradesh government’s proposal to establish three separate capitals: Visakhapatnam as the executive capital, Kurnool as the judicial capital, and Amaravati as the legislative capital. The High Court had earlier ruled against this plan, asserting that the state legislature lacked the authority to alter the capital’s status. In response, the state government appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that such decisions fall within its jurisdiction.
The Supreme Court’s recent remarks underscore the judiciary’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring that governmental actions align with constitutional principles. The matter remains under judicial review, with further hearings anticipated.β
Sources