Rahul Gandhi Critiques India-US Trade Deal, Labels PM Modi as 'Narendra Surrender Modi'

Opposition leader accuses government of betraying farmers in favor of foreign interests

India, February 13, 2026, Friday, 2026

India, October 15, 2023, Sunday, 2023

Rahul Gandhi has launched a scathing attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi regarding the recent India-US trade deal. He has labeled the Prime Minister as "Narendra Surrender Modi," claiming that the agreement places undue pressure on Indian farmers. Gandhi argues that the trade deal creates an uneven playing field, favoring foreign agricultural products over local produce.

Gandhi's comments come amid growing concerns among farmers about the implications of the trade agreement. He asserts that the deal allows subsidized foreign crops to flood the Indian market, undermining the livelihoods of local farmers. This, he argues, is a betrayal of the agricultural community, which forms a significant part of India's economy.

The Congress leader emphasized that the trade deal is not just a political issue but a matter of survival for many farmers. He stated that the government has failed to protect the interests of those who toil in the fields. According to Gandhi, the agreement prioritizes foreign interests at the expense of Indian farmers.

In response to Gandhi's allegations, Union ministers Piyush Goyal and Shivraj Singh Chouhan have vehemently refuted his claims. They described Gandhi's statements as baseless and misleading. Goyal, the Minister of Commerce and Industry, argued that the trade deal is designed to benefit both nations. He emphasized that it opens new markets for Indian products while ensuring fair competition.

Chouhan, the Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh, echoed Goyal's sentiments. He accused Gandhi of politicizing the issue for personal gain. Chouhan asserted that the government is committed to supporting farmers and has implemented various schemes to enhance their welfare.

The debate over the trade deal highlights the broader tensions between the government and opposition parties regarding agricultural policies. Farmers have been vocal about their concerns, fearing that the influx of foreign products could lead to lower prices for their goods. This fear is compounded by the ongoing struggles many farmers face, including rising costs and unpredictable weather patterns.

Gandhi's remarks have resonated with many in the agricultural community. Farmers across the country have expressed their apprehensions about the potential impact of the trade deal. They worry that their hard work may not be enough to compete against heavily subsidized foreign crops.

The opposition leader has called for a more transparent discussion about the trade deal. He believes that the government should engage with farmers and stakeholders to address their concerns. Gandhi insists that a collaborative approach is essential for ensuring the sustainability of Indian agriculture.

The government, however, maintains that the trade deal is a strategic move to strengthen economic ties with the United States. Officials argue that it will lead to increased investment and job creation in various sectors, including agriculture. They assert that the deal includes provisions to protect Indian farmers from unfair competition.

Despite these assurances, skepticism remains among farmers. Many feel that their voices are not being heard in the decision-making process. They demand more accountability from the government and seek assurances that their interests will be safeguarded.

The political landscape surrounding the trade deal is complex. As the opposition ramps up its criticism, the government is tasked with balancing international relations and domestic agricultural needs. The stakes are high, as the livelihoods of millions of farmers hang in the balance.

Gandhi's use of the term "Narendra Surrender Modi" reflects a growing frustration among opposition leaders. They argue that the Prime Minister's policies often favor corporate interests over those of ordinary citizens. This narrative has gained traction, particularly in rural areas where agriculture is the primary source of income.

The trade deal has also sparked discussions about the future of Indian agriculture. Experts warn that without adequate protections, local farmers may struggle to survive in a globalized market. They advocate for policies that prioritize food security and support sustainable farming practices.

As the debate continues, both sides are preparing for a prolonged discussion. The government is likely to defend its position vigorously, while the opposition will seek to rally public support against what they perceive as an unfair agreement.

In the coming weeks, farmers' organizations are expected to organize protests and rallies to voice their concerns. They aim to draw attention to the potential risks posed by the trade deal and demand a more equitable approach to agricultural policy.

The outcome of this political battle could have lasting implications for India's agricultural sector. As the government navigates the complexities of international trade, the voices of farmers will remain crucial in shaping the future of agriculture in the country.

The trade deal is not just a matter of economics; it is a question of identity for many farmers. They see their way of life threatened by policies that prioritize foreign interests. The ongoing dialogue between the government and farmers will be essential in addressing these concerns and finding a path forward.

As the situation unfolds, all eyes will be on the government's next steps. Will it heed the warnings of farmers, or will it continue down a path that many believe jeopardizes their livelihoods? The answers to these questions will shape the future of agriculture in India for years to come.

Source: