Rahul Gandhi Criticizes PM Modi Over India-US Trade Deal

Concerns Raised for Farmers and Textile Exporters Amid Trade Negotiations

India, February 14, 2026, Saturday, 2026

India, October 10, 2023, Tuesday, 2023

Rahul Gandhi has launched a scathing attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi regarding the recent India-US trade deal. He labeled Modi as "Narendra Surrender Modi," suggesting that the Prime Minister has compromised India's interests in favor of foreign powers. Gandhi's comments come amid growing concerns about the potential impact of the trade agreement on Indian farmers, particularly those in the cotton and textile sectors.

Gandhi's Critique of the Trade Deal
During a press conference, Rahul Gandhi expressed his apprehensions about the trade deal's implications for Indian agriculture. He specifically highlighted the cotton farmers and textile exporters who may suffer due to unfavorable tariff structures. According to Gandhi, the deal could place Indian farmers at a significant disadvantage compared to their Bangladeshi counterparts. He pointed out that while India would face an 18% tariff on garments, Bangladesh would enjoy a 0% tariff by importing US cotton. This disparity, he argued, could lead to severe economic repercussions for Indian farmers.

Gandhi's rhetoric emphasized the notion that the trade deal is a trap for Indian agriculture. He warned that the agreement could undermine the livelihoods of countless farmers who depend on cotton cultivation. The former Congress president urged the government to reconsider its approach and prioritize the welfare of Indian farmers over international trade agreements.

Government's Response
In response to Gandhi's allegations, Union Minister Piyush Goyal defended the trade deal, asserting that the interests of farmers are well protected. Goyal emphasized that the government has taken measures to ensure that Indian agriculture remains competitive. He dismissed Gandhi's claims as unfounded and politically motivated.

Goyal pointed out that the trade deal is designed to enhance economic cooperation between India and the United States. He argued that the agreement would create new opportunities for Indian businesses and boost exports. The minister reassured farmers that the government is committed to safeguarding their interests while pursuing beneficial trade relationships.

Impact on Cotton Farmers
The cotton industry is a vital part of India's agricultural landscape. It supports millions of farmers and contributes significantly to the economy. Gandhi's concerns resonate with many in the farming community who fear that the trade deal could lead to increased competition from countries like Bangladesh. The potential for lower tariffs on imported cotton could result in a flood of cheaper products in the Indian market, jeopardizing local farmers' incomes.

Farmers have already been facing challenges due to fluctuating prices and changing weather patterns. The added pressure from international trade agreements could exacerbate their struggles. Many farmers worry that they may not be able to compete with imported goods, leading to a decline in their livelihoods.

Textile Exporters at Risk
The textile industry is another sector that could be adversely affected by the trade deal. Indian textile exporters have long relied on the domestic cotton supply to produce garments for both local and international markets. If the trade deal allows for cheaper imports from Bangladesh, Indian textile manufacturers may find it difficult to maintain their market share.

Gandhi's warnings highlight the interconnectedness of agriculture and industry in India. A decline in cotton prices could lead to reduced production in the textile sector, resulting in job losses and economic instability. The potential fallout from the trade deal raises questions about the government's strategy in balancing trade relations with domestic economic needs.

Political Ramifications
The trade deal has become a contentious issue in Indian politics. Gandhi's comments reflect a broader concern among opposition parties regarding the government's handling of trade negotiations. Critics argue that the Modi administration has prioritized international relations over the welfare of Indian farmers and workers.

As the debate continues, the opposition is likely to leverage this issue in upcoming elections. Farmers' distress and the potential impact on the textile industry could become focal points for political campaigns. The government will need to address these concerns to maintain support among rural voters.

Public Sentiment
Public sentiment regarding the trade deal is mixed. While some view it as an opportunity for economic growth, others share Gandhi's apprehensions about its impact on agriculture. Farmers' organizations have expressed their discontent, calling for more transparency in trade negotiations and greater protection for local industries.

Many farmers feel that their voices are not being heard in the decision-making process. They demand a more inclusive approach that considers the needs of those directly affected by trade agreements. The growing discontent among farmers could lead to increased protests and calls for policy changes.

Future of Trade Relations
The future of India-US trade relations remains uncertain. As negotiations progress, the government faces the challenge of balancing international commitments with domestic priorities. Ensuring that farmers and textile exporters are not left behind will be crucial for the success of any trade agreement.

The Modi administration must navigate these complexities carefully. Engaging with stakeholders, including farmers and industry representatives, will be essential in crafting policies that benefit all parties involved. The outcome of the trade deal could have lasting implications for India's agricultural and industrial sectors.

In summary, Rahul Gandhi's criticism of PM Modi over the India-US trade deal underscores the significant concerns surrounding its impact on farmers and textile exporters. As the debate unfolds, the government will need to address these issues to maintain stability and support within the agricultural community.

Source: