In a recent development from Thane, Maharashtra, a special POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) court granted bail to a 21-year-old man accused of abducting and sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl. The court acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations but noted evidence suggesting a consensual relationship between the two. The girl reportedly claimed they were in a relationship and had engaged in sexual activity, and the court observed that she appeared mature enough to understand the consequences of her actions .

This decision has sparked discussions about the interpretation of consent in cases involving minors. While the POCSO Act is designed to protect children from sexual exploitation, some recent rulings have considered the nature of the relationship and the minor’s understanding of her actions when granting bail. For instance, the Bombay High Court has previously granted bail in cases where the minor voluntarily stayed with the accused and appeared to understand the implications of her actions .​

These developments highlight the ongoing legal debates regarding the balance between protecting minors and considering the nuances of individual cases.​

Sources