Defence Minister Rajnath Singh clarifies that the objective was not to escalate war but to counter terrorism, secure sovereignty, and send a message of deterrence to Pakistan.

Bhuj, Gujarat : October 3, 2025

In a firm yet balanced address to soldiers stationed near the India-Pakistan border in Bhuj, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh reiterated that the core aim of Operation Sindoor was not to escalate hostilities into a full-fledged war, but to neutralize imminent threats, uphold national security, and convey a message of deterrence to adversaries. Singh emphasized that India’s response reflected both restraint and resolve, a combination that not only defended sovereignty but also showcased the superior capability of the country’s armed forces.

The operation, conducted between May 7 and 10, 2025, was a joint forces mission involving the Indian Army, Navy, and Air Force, responding to a series of cross-border hostilities and failed infiltration attempts from Pakistan. According to Singh, the swift counter-action exposed weaknesses in the Pakistan air defence system, demonstrated the effectiveness of India’s integrated defence posture, and reaffirmed the country’s ability to act decisively at a time and place of its choosing.

Escalation, War, and Restraint

At the heart of Singh’s statement was a deliberate attempt to underline restraint in the face of provocation. While Pakistan attempted to escalate tensions by launching drones, missiles, and infiltration attempts across multiple fronts — stretching from Leh in Ladakh to the disputed Sir Creek region in Gujarat — India’s response was carefully calibrated.

“The objective of Operation Sindoor was not to escalate and start a war,” Singh declared. “India has the capability to inflict heavy damage at any place, at any time, and in a manner of its choosing. But we acted with restraint because our target was not the people of Pakistan, but the infrastructure of terrorism that thrives under its protection.”

This nuanced stance highlights India’s ability to balance hard power with strategic patience, a message that resonates not only with its adversary but also with global observers.

Cross-Border Hostilities and the Sir Creek Flashpoint

The Sir Creek region, a 96-km tidal estuary in the marshes of the Rann of Kutch, has long been a bone of contention between India and Pakistan. The dispute centers on the boundary demarcation and access to potential natural resources such as oil and gas in the Arabian Sea.

During Operation Sindoor, Singh revealed, Pakistani forces attempted to exploit this disputed region by increasing their military activity near Sir Creek. Intelligence reports indicated attempts to launch multiple incursions, supported by drones and missile strikes. These were swiftly repelled by India’s coastal defences, which remain on high alert.

Singh issued a provocation warning: “If Pakistan dares to misadventure in the Sir Creek area again, India will respond in a manner that could change both the history and geography of the region.”

This warning is significant. It signals India’s willingness to escalate if sovereignty is directly threatened, while maintaining that its primary intent is defensive, not aggressive.

Indian Defence Posture and Joint Forces

A recurring theme of Singh’s remarks was the success of the joint forces approach. The Army, Navy, and Air Force worked in unison during Operation Sindoor, exemplifying the government’s emphasis on theatre commands and integrated battle groups.

• The Navy maintained dominance along the western seaboard, ensuring that Pakistan’s maritime manoeuvres were neutralized.
• The Army prevented infiltration along the Line of Control (LoC) and secured border positions across multiple sectors.

This coordinated response demonstrated that India’s modernized military structure is capable of handling multi-front challenges simultaneously. Singh praised the armed forces, stating, “The synergy among our services ensured that all military objectives of Operation Sindoor were achieved without unnecessary escalation.”

Counter-Terrorism and National Security

While much of the rhetoric focused on deterrence, the operational focus was counter-terrorism. Singh stressed that Operation Sindoor was triggered by repeated attempts to infiltrate Indian territory and carry out terror attacks. Intelligence had also pointed to Pakistan-backed militant groups preparing for strikes following the Pahalgam terror incident earlier in the year.

By striking at launch pads, drone bases, and logistical hubs across the border, India not only neutralized immediate threats but also disrupted the wider network of terrorism. Singh underscored that this was a measured retaliation against terrorism, not a war against Pakistan’s population.

“Our fight is against terrorism, not with the common citizens of Pakistan,” Singh said. “But when terrorism is sponsored and supported by the state, India cannot and will not remain silent.”

Deterrence and Message to the World

One of the most significant aspects of Operation Sindoor was its strategic messaging. The operation was conducted with precision and restraint, ensuring that India did not appear as the aggressor, while still making it clear that it possesses overwhelming retaliatory power.

According to Singh, the message to the world was twofold:

1. India has the capability and willingness to inflict decisive damage on adversaries.
2. India prefers restraint and responsibility, even when provoked.

This balance strengthens India’s global standing as a responsible power committed to international norms, while also warning its adversaries of the consequences of continued provocations.History, Geography, and the Lessons of Conflict

Singh’s reference to “changing history and geography” is rooted in India’s military history with Pakistan. From the 1965 war, when Indian troops advanced into Lahore, to the 1971 war, which led to the creation of Bangladesh, history shows that Indian forces are capable of altering the geopolitical landscape when pushed to the wall.

By invoking this legacy, Singh reinforced the idea that while India does not seek war, it has the historical precedent and present capability to reshape outcomes if provoked.

Sovereignty, Defence, and the Road Ahead

In his concluding remarks, Singh stressed that sovereignty and defence remain India’s top priorities. The success of Operation Sindoor, he argued, should not be measured only in terms of battlefield victories but also in terms of its broader strategic effect: deterring Pakistan, safeguarding borders, and strengthening India’s defence posture.

“Our fight against terrorism continues,” Singh said. “But let the world know — India will never compromise on its sovereignty, nor will we allow any provocation to go unanswered.”

Source: