Home Minister resigns amid outrage over police violence.

Nepal, September 10, 2025

Background of the Protests

Nepal has recently witnessed intense Gen Z protests that led to a tragic loss of life. Nineteen people died during these protests against police violence. The use of force by authorities sparked outrage among young citizens, prompting calls for accountability. The situation escalated quickly, resulting in significant unrest. These Gen Z protests reflect a growing discontent with governmental approaches to civil rights and freedom of expression.

The government’s response to these protests included a controversial social media ban. This ban aimed to curb the spread of information among activists and citizens. However, many argued it infringed upon their rights to free expression. Thus, the lifting of the social media ban is significant for the ongoing dialogue about civil liberties in Nepal.

Resignation of Home Minister

In a surprising turn of events, Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak announced his resignation. His departure comes in the wake of widespread criticism regarding his handling of the protests. Many citizens blamed the government for not taking the concerns of Gen Z seriously. The police’s aggressive tactics during the protests led to numerous injuries and fatalities.

Ramesh Lekhak’s resignation is seen as a response to public outcry. It also reflects a shift in political accountability in a country where youth activism is rising. Activists are demanding justice for the victims and a thorough investigation into police misconduct. As public pressure mounts, the government must address these issues to restore trust.

Impact of Social Media on Protests

Social media played a crucial role during the Gen Z protests. It allowed protesters to communicate and organize effectively, despite the ban. Images and videos shared online revealed the extent of police violence, galvanizing support for the movement. The government’s decision to lift the ban demonstrates an acknowledgment of social media’s power in shaping public discourse.

Moving forward, the government will need to engage with the youth to mitigate future unrest. Ensuring accountability and transparency will be essential. Activists urge officials to listen to the voices of young people who are increasingly advocating for their rights. Genuine dialogue could prevent future tragedies and foster a healthier democratic environment.

Source