Lawyer Claims Assault by Mob at Court Premises

Advocate Rakesh Kishore Defends His Actions Following Shoe-Throwing Incident

India, December 9, 2025, Tuesday, 2025

India, October 10, 2023, Tuesday, 2023

Advocate Rakesh Kishore has reported a violent incident at Karkardooma Court in Delhi. He claims that he was attacked by a mob of 100 to 150 individuals. This group allegedly assaulted him with slippers, a reaction to his previous controversial act of throwing a shoe at former Chief Justice of India (CJI) B R Gavai. The incident has sparked significant attention and debate, especially given the sensitive nature of the accusations involved.

Details of the Incident
Kishore described the chaotic scene at the court. He stated that the mob confronted him aggressively, expressing their anger over his past actions. The lawyer claims that they accused Gavai of insulting Sanatan Dharma, a term that refers to the eternal order or law in Hinduism. This accusation appears to have fueled the mob's aggression towards Kishore. A video capturing the incident has surfaced online, further amplifying the public's interest in the unfolding drama.

Kishore's Previous Actions
The incident at Karkardooma Court is not the first time Kishore has made headlines. Earlier, he gained notoriety for hurling a shoe at former CJI Gavai during a court proceeding. This act was widely condemned and led to significant backlash against him. Following the shoe-throwing incident, Kishore's legal license was suspended pending an inquiry. This suspension has raised questions about his professional conduct and the implications of his actions on the legal community.

Mob Mentality and Public Reaction
The attack on Kishore highlights the dangers of mob mentality. In recent years, there have been numerous instances where individuals have faced violence for expressing dissenting opinions or challenging authority figures. The incident at Karkardooma Court serves as a stark reminder of how quickly a situation can escalate when emotions run high. Public reactions to the incident have been mixed. Some express sympathy for Kishore, viewing him as a victim of mob violence. Others criticize his earlier actions, arguing that he brought this aggression upon himself.

Legal Implications
The legal ramifications of this incident are significant. Kishore's actions, both in throwing the shoe and in the subsequent altercation, raise questions about his fitness to practice law. The suspension of his license is currently under review, and the outcome of the inquiry will determine his future in the legal profession. Additionally, the mob's actions may lead to criminal charges against those involved. Authorities will likely investigate the incident further, seeking to identify and hold accountable those who participated in the assault.

The Role of Social Media
Social media plays a crucial role in shaping public perception of events like this. The video of the attack has gone viral, prompting widespread discussion across various platforms. Many users have taken to social media to express their opinions, with some supporting Kishore and others condemning his previous behavior. This online discourse reflects the polarized views within society regarding issues of justice, authority, and individual rights.

Kishore's Defense
In light of the attack, Kishore has defended his actions. He argues that his shoe-throwing incident was a form of protest against what he perceived as an insult to his beliefs. He maintains that he acted out of a sense of duty to uphold the values of Sanatan Dharma. Kishore's defense raises important questions about the boundaries of protest and the acceptable forms of dissent in a democratic society.

The Impact on the Legal Community
The incident has broader implications for the legal community in India. It raises concerns about the safety of lawyers and their ability to perform their duties without fear of violence. The attack on Kishore may deter other legal professionals from speaking out or taking bold actions in court. This chilling effect could undermine the integrity of the legal system and the principles of justice it is meant to uphold.

Public Discourse on Violence
The incident at Karkardooma Court has sparked a larger conversation about violence in society. Many are questioning the normalization of aggressive behavior in public spaces. The attack on Kishore serves as a reminder of the need for dialogue about how to address grievances without resorting to violence. Advocates for peace and non-violence are calling for a reevaluation of how conflicts are resolved in both legal and social contexts.

Future Developments
As the inquiry into Kishore's actions continues, the legal community and the public will be watching closely. The outcome of this situation could set important precedents for how similar cases are handled in the future. It remains to be seen how the courts will respond to the mob violence and what measures will be taken to ensure the safety of legal professionals.

In summary, the attack on Advocate Rakesh Kishore at Karkardooma Court has raised numerous questions about the intersection of law, violence, and public discourse. The incident highlights the complexities of dissent in a democratic society and the challenges faced by those who challenge authority. As the situation unfolds, it will undoubtedly continue to capture the attention of both the legal community and the public at large.

Source: