On April 23, 2025, Additional Sessions Judge Pulastya Pramachala of Delhi’s Karkardooma Court referred advocate Anil Kumar Goswami’s conduct to the Delhi High Court and the Bar Council of Delhi for assessment. This action followed an incident during a cross-examination session in the case of State v. Brij Mohan Sharma @ Gabbar & ors. (SC No. 162/20).

During the proceedings, Goswami, acting as a proxy counsel, was questioned by the judge about his preparedness for cross-examination. In response, Goswami allegedly remarked, “Are you settling any score?” and “I don’t know what you or the stenographer have written.” Upon reviewing the vakalatnama, the court found discrepancies, including the absence of Goswami’s signature, leading to further concerns about his professional conduct.

Judge Pramachala described Goswami’s behavior as “shocking” and indicative of intentions not aligned with professional standards. The court noted that such conduct undermines the dignity of the legal profession and referred the matter to the appropriate authorities for further evaluation.

Sources