8 Injured in Firing; Wangchuk Ends Fast

Srinagar (Jammu & Kashmir / Ladakh, India)

The fragile peace in the Himalayan region of Ladakh was shattered on Wednesday when protests demanding special rights and statehood turned violent, leading to the death of four civilians and injuries to at least 58 others. The incident marks a tragic escalation of long-standing demands for Sixth Schedule protections, tribal rights, and greater political representation in a region that has been navigating a new identity ever since its separation from Jammu and Kashmir in 2019.

This development has brought renewed attention to the socio-political aspirations of Ladakh’s people, the role of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk, and the Central Government’s response, which has labeled the unrest as “premeditated.”

The Union Territory of Ladakh

In August 2019, the Indian government abrogated Article 370 of the Constitution, which granted special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, and bifurcated the region into two Union Territories—Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. While the move was celebrated by some as a step towards greater integration with India, it also triggered uncertainty in Ladakh.

For Ladakhis, the creation of a Union Territory meant direct administration by the Centre, but without the legislative powers of a full-fledged state. Many locals feared that the absence of constitutional safeguards could open the door to demographic changes, exploitation of natural resources, and erosion of tribal identity. These concerns crystallized into demands for the inclusion of Ladakh under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides protections for tribal communities in certain areas of India.

Sonam Wangchuk : Sonam Wangchuk, the renowned education reformer and climate activist. Wangchuk, known globally for his work on sustainable technologies, began a hunger strike earlier this year to draw attention to Ladakh’s demands.

• He called for Sixth Schedule status to protect Ladakh’s fragile environment and indigenous culture.
• His 35-day-long protest, including a 14-day hunger strike, became a rallying point for Ladakhis.
• Wangchuk warned that without constitutional safeguards, Ladakh could face ecological disaster and loss of tribal rights.

Although he ended his hunger strike recently, citing health reasons, his movement ignited fresh energy among youth groups and civil society, setting the stage for the protests that turned violent in Leh.

The Protests in Leh

On Wednesday, thousands of demonstrators gathered in Leh to press their demands. Reports suggest that the protest, which began peacefully, escalated when police and paramilitary forces allegedly opened fire to disperse the crowd.

• Four protesters lost their lives in the firing.
• 58 others were injured, many critically, leading to widespread outrage.
• Demonstrators set the BJP office in Leh ablaze, a symbolic act reflecting anger at what many see as the government’s inaction or indifference.

This incident marks the first fatal violence in Ladakh since it was carved out as a Union Territory in 2019, underscoring the depth of frustration among residents.

Central Government’s Response

The Central Government has strongly condemned the violence, suggesting that the events were not spontaneous but premeditated.

• Officials have accused Wangchuk and other activists of using the hunger strike as a platform to incite unrest.
• The government believes references to Arab Spring-style uprisings and Gen Z protests in Nepal during speeches were deliberately provocative.
• Security forces have been placed on high alert, and additional reinforcements were rushed to Leh to prevent further escalation.

The Centre’s stance indicates a hardening of its position, framing the protests as part of a larger, possibly externally influenced, movement rather than an organic expression of local grievances.

Sixth Schedule Matters

The Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution provides autonomous administrative and legislative powers to tribal communities in certain areas of Northeast India. Inclusion under this framework would grant Ladakh’s tribal population protections over:

1. Land ownership – Preventing outsiders from buying tribal land.
2. Cultural preservation – Safeguarding traditions, language, and heritage.
3. Resource management – Ensuring locals benefit from the use of natural resources like water, minerals, and forests.
4. Political representation – Allowing local councils to make decisions tailored to community needs.

For Ladakhis, Sixth Schedule status is not just a constitutional technicality—it is seen as vital for survival in a region where ecological balance and cultural identity are under constant threat.

Broader Implications

The unrest in Ladakh has implications far beyond the region:

• Strategic Concerns: Ladakh shares sensitive borders with China and Pakistan, making stability crucial for India’s national security.
• Domestic Politics: The violence poses a challenge for the ruling BJP, which had initially projected the creation of UT Ladakh as a victory. The attack on the BJP office signals a loss of political goodwill in the region.
• Environmental Risks: Ladakh’s fragile ecosystem is under immense pressure due to climate change, militarization, and development projects. Without safeguards, activists warn of irreversible damage.
• Tribal Rights in India: The incident could reignite debates on how India balances development with indigenous rights across its tribal regions.

Voices from the Ground

Eyewitnesses described scenes of chaos as protesters clashed with security forces. Families of the deceased have demanded accountability, while civil society groups have called for a judicial inquiry into the use of live ammunition.

Youth organizations have pledged to continue their struggle until statehood and Sixth Schedule protections are granted. Meanwhile, religious and cultural leaders in Ladakh have appealed for calm, urging the government to engage in meaningful dialogue rather than repression.

Significance of the Unrest

The Leh violence is not an isolated incident but part of a broader narrative of alienation and discontent. The people of Ladakh feel that despite promises of greater autonomy and prosperity post-2019, their voices remain unheard.

This unrest raises serious questions:

• Can Ladakh’s demands be addressed within India’s federal structure?
• Will the government extend Sixth Schedule protections beyond the Northeast?
• How will India reconcile national security concerns with local aspirations in such a sensitive region?

Source: