Centre Denies Sixth Schedule and Statehood for Ladakh

Territorial council proposal met with skepticism from local leaders

India, February 12, 2026, Thursday, 2026

India, October 10, 2023, Tuesday, 2023

The Centre has officially informed major political groups in Ladakh that it will not grant Sixth Schedule status or statehood to the region. This decision has sparked significant backlash from local leaders who view the proposed alternative—a 'territorial council' model—as inadequate and dismissive of their demands.

Political Context
Ladakh has been a focal point of political discussions since its separation from Jammu and Kashmir in 2019. The region's unique cultural and geographical identity has led to calls for greater autonomy. The Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council (LAHDC) and the Ladakh Buddhist Association (LAB) have been at the forefront of these demands. They argue that Sixth Schedule status would provide necessary protections for the region's indigenous communities and ensure sustainable development.

The Centre's recent announcement has reignited tensions. Leaders from the Ladakh Union Territory (KDA) and LAB expressed their disappointment. They argue that the proposed territorial council lacks the necessary powers to address the region's pressing issues. The council would not provide the same level of autonomy or financial support that statehood or Sixth Schedule status would offer.

Disagreements Over Sixth Schedule
The Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution provides for the administration of tribal areas in the northeastern states. It allows for greater self-governance through autonomous councils. However, the Centre's assessment of Ladakh's suitability for this status has raised eyebrows. Officials cited concerns over the region's financial viability and governance structure.

Local leaders counter these claims. They argue that Ladakh's rich cultural heritage and unique demographic makeup warrant special consideration. The region's economic potential, driven by tourism and natural resources, could be harnessed effectively with the right governance framework. They believe that the Sixth Schedule would empower local communities to manage their resources and development.

Financial Viability Concerns
The Centre's argument regarding financial viability has been met with skepticism. Leaders in Ladakh contend that the region has the potential to thrive economically. They point to the influx of tourists and the growing interest in sustainable development as indicators of this potential. However, they also acknowledge that without adequate support from the Centre, realizing this potential will be challenging.

The proposed territorial council is seen as a compromise that fails to address the root issues. Local leaders fear that it will merely serve as a bureaucratic layer without real power. They argue that true autonomy is essential for the region's development and for preserving its cultural identity.

Local Reactions
The reaction from Ladakh's political landscape has been swift. Leaders from various parties have united in their criticism of the Centre's decision. They describe the territorial council proposal as a "farce" and a "betrayal" of the people of Ladakh. Many have called for a united front to demand greater autonomy and recognition of their rights.

Public sentiment mirrors this political discontent. Many residents feel sidelined in the decision-making process. They express frustration over the lack of consultation and engagement from the Centre. The feeling of being unheard has fueled protests and demonstrations across the region.

Future Implications
The Centre's decision could have long-lasting implications for Ladakh. The region's political stability may be at risk if local leaders continue to feel marginalized. The proposed territorial council may not be enough to quell the growing unrest. As demands for autonomy intensify, the Centre may need to reconsider its approach.

The situation in Ladakh is emblematic of broader issues facing many regions in India. The balance between central authority and regional autonomy remains a contentious topic. The Centre's handling of Ladakh's aspirations could set a precedent for how similar situations are managed in the future.

In the coming weeks, local leaders are expected to ramp up their advocacy efforts. They aim to raise awareness about the importance of autonomy and the need for a governance model that reflects the aspirations of Ladakh's people. The political landscape in the region is likely to remain dynamic as these discussions unfold.

The Centre's decision has not only affected political leaders but also the general populace. Many residents are now questioning their future in a region that feels increasingly disconnected from the central government. The call for statehood and Sixth Schedule status resonates deeply among the people, who seek recognition and empowerment.

As the situation develops, it will be crucial to monitor the responses from both the Centre and local leaders. The dialogue surrounding Ladakh's governance is far from over. The stakes are high, and the outcome will significantly impact the region's future.

Source: