Court stresses minors’ rights and rebukes lapse in judicial discretion

New Delhi, August 28, 2025 – The High Court has strongly criticized a lower court judge for sending a teenage boy to police custody in a case that was clearly bailable. The court observed that such an action was not only contrary to established legal principles but also a direct violation of the rights guaranteed to juveniles under Indian law. The ruling reaffirmed that judicial officers must exercise greater caution while dealing with cases involving minors, as any lapse can cause irreversible harm.

The case involved a teenager who was arrested in connection with a minor offense that fell within the category of bailable cases. Instead of granting him bail as a matter of right, the lower court judge had directed that the boy be placed in police custody. The High Court, while hearing the matter, stressed that this decision was both arbitrary and illegal.

The bench further highlighted that the Juvenile Justice Act and criminal procedure clearly safeguard children against unnecessary detention. According to the court, the judge failed to apply the mandatory provisions that require bail to be granted to minors in bailable cases. The High Court remarked that such actions display a lack of sensitivity towards vulnerable sections of society and undermine the purpose of child protection laws.

Legal experts said the ruling sends a strong message to the judiciary about upholding procedural safeguards in cases involving children. They pointed out that police custody can expose minors to trauma and risks, which is why the law prioritizes bail and rehabilitation over punitive measures. The court’s intervention has been welcomed as a step towards strengthening the accountability of judicial officers handling sensitive cases.

The High Court also noted that the protection of children in conflict with the law is a constitutional mandate, and courts must ensure that due process is strictly followed. It directed the judicial training academies to sensitize magistrates and judges about the proper application of juvenile justice principles to prevent such violations in the future.

Furthermore, the ruling underscored that bail in bailable offenses is not a matter of judicial discretion but a statutory right. Denying it in the case of a minor, the court observed, amounted to a grave miscarriage of justice. The bench stated that the incident should serve as a reminder to all judicial officers that their orders carry immense weight and directly affect the lives and liberties of citizens, especially vulnerable children.

The decision is expected to reinforce legal safeguards for minors across the country. It also highlights the judiciary’s role in protecting children’s rights and ensuring that laws designed for their welfare are implemented without dilution.

Source