​On April 26, 2025, the Delhi High Court addressed a significant case concerning a substantial GST demand. The court set aside a ₹10 crore GST demand order issued under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, due to the tax authority’s failure to adequately consider the assessee’s detailed reply to the Show Cause Notice (SCN).

In this case, the assessee had submitted a comprehensive response addressing various issues raised in the SCN, including declarations of output tax and claims of input tax credit. However, the adjudicating officer dismissed the reply as unsatisfactory without a thorough examination of its merits. The High Court found this approach lacking in adherence to principles of natural justice.​

The court emphasized that if the tax officer required additional information or clarification, it was incumbent upon them to explicitly request such details from the assessee. The absence of such a request and the superficial dismissal of the assessee’s reply led the court to conclude that the adjudication process was flawed.​

Consequently, the Delhi High Court quashed the impugned order and remitted the matter back to the proper officer for re-adjudication. The court directed that the officer must:

Clearly communicate any further information or documentation required from the assessee.

Provide the assessee with an opportunity for a personal hearing.

Issue a fresh, reasoned order in accordance with the law within the stipulated timeframe under Section 75(3) of the CGST Act.​

This ruling underscores the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring fair tax administration and the necessity for tax authorities to adhere strictly to procedural fairness and natural justice principles.​

Sources