FOGSI Calls for Reversal of NEET-PG Percentile Reductions

Concerns Raised Over Meritocracy and Patient Safety

India, February 13, 2026, Friday, 2026

India, October 10, 2023, Tuesday, 2023

The Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI) has taken a firm stance against the recent reductions in the qualifying percentile for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test for Postgraduate (NEET-PG). The organization has formally requested the National Medical Commission (NMC) to review and withdraw these changes. FOGSI's concerns center around the implications of lowering the qualifying threshold on the quality of medical education and patient care.

Impact on Meritocracy

FOGSI argues that repeated cuts to the NEET-PG qualifying percentile undermine the principle of meritocracy in medical education. The organization believes that a high qualifying standard is essential for maintaining the integrity of the medical profession. By lowering the percentile, FOGSI warns that the system may inadvertently allow less qualified candidates to enter postgraduate programs. This could lead to a dilution of academic standards and a potential decline in the quality of healthcare services.

The organization emphasizes that merit-based selection is crucial for ensuring that only the most capable candidates are trained as specialists. FOGSI's leadership has expressed concern that the current trend of reducing the qualifying marks may create a perception that entry into postgraduate medical education is becoming increasingly accessible, regardless of a candidate's actual competence.

Quality of Specialist Training

Another significant concern raised by FOGSI pertains to the quality of specialist training. The organization argues that lowering the qualifying percentile could compromise the rigor of medical education. If less qualified candidates are admitted into postgraduate programs, the overall quality of training may suffer. This could have far-reaching implications for the healthcare system, as specialists play a critical role in patient care.

FOGSI has called for a thorough evaluation of the impact that these percentile reductions may have on the training of future specialists. The organization believes that maintaining high standards in medical education is essential for producing competent healthcare professionals who can meet the demands of an evolving medical landscape.

Patient Safety at Risk

Patient safety is another area of concern highlighted by FOGSI. The organization asserts that the quality of care provided by specialists directly affects patient outcomes. If the qualifications of those entering postgraduate programs are compromised, it could lead to a decrease in the quality of care that patients receive. FOGSI has urged the NMC to consider the potential risks to patient safety when making decisions about qualifying percentiles.

The organization has pointed out that a well-trained specialist is vital for effective diagnosis and treatment. If the standards for entry into postgraduate training are lowered, there is a risk that patients may not receive the level of care they deserve. FOGSI believes that the NMC must prioritize patient safety in its decision-making processes.

The 'Pay-to-Enter' Risk

FOGSI has also raised alarms about the potential for a "pay-to-enter" culture in medical education. The organization fears that lowering the qualifying percentile may encourage candidates to rely on financial means rather than academic merit to secure a place in postgraduate programs. This could create an environment where wealth, rather than competence, becomes the determining factor for entry into medical specialties.

The implications of such a shift could be detrimental to the healthcare system. FOGSI argues that a focus on financial capability over academic achievement could lead to a generation of specialists who are ill-equipped to handle the complexities of patient care. The organization has called for the NMC to take a firm stance against any practices that may promote this culture.

Calls for Transparency and Accountability

In light of these concerns, FOGSI is advocating for greater transparency and accountability in the decision-making processes of the NMC. The organization believes that stakeholders in the medical community should have a voice in discussions about qualifying standards. FOGSI has urged the NMC to engage with medical professionals, educators, and other relevant parties to ensure that any changes to the NEET-PG qualifying percentile are made with careful consideration of their potential impact.

FOGSI has also emphasized the importance of data-driven decision-making. The organization has called for the NMC to provide evidence supporting the rationale behind any reductions in qualifying percentiles. By making data available, the NMC can foster trust and confidence among medical professionals and the public.

Advocacy for Higher Standards

FOGSI remains committed to advocating for higher standards in medical education. The organization believes that maintaining rigorous qualifying criteria is essential for ensuring that the next generation of specialists is well-prepared to meet the challenges of modern healthcare. FOGSI has pledged to continue its efforts to engage with the NMC and other stakeholders to promote policies that prioritize meritocracy, quality training, and patient safety.

As the debate over NEET-PG qualifying percentiles continues, FOGSI's position highlights the critical need for a balanced approach that considers the interests of both medical professionals and patients. The organization is determined to ensure that the integrity of medical education is upheld and that the healthcare system remains robust and capable of delivering high-quality care.

In summary, FOGSI's call for the rollback of NEET-PG percentile cuts reflects deep concerns about the future of medical education and patient safety in India. The organization is advocating for a return to higher standards, emphasizing the importance of meritocracy and the need for transparency in decision-making processes. As discussions unfold, the implications of these changes will be closely monitored by all stakeholders in the medical community.

Source: