Dual Threat for Foreign Students: U.S. Proposes Major Overhaul to
News THE ECONOMIC TIMES, livelaw.in, LAW, LAWYERS NEAR ME, LAWYERS NEAR BY ME, LIVE LAW, THE TIMES OF INDIA, HINDUSTAN TIMES, the indian express, LIVE LAW .IN
The Biden administration’s new proposals to limit F-1 visa duration and restructure the OPT work program spark widespread concern among universities and international students over reduced stay periods and tighter work rules.
Washington D.C., United States | Tuesday, October 28, 2025
In a move that has sent shockwaves across global education circles, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has proposed sweeping regulatory changes that could significantly alter how international students live, study, and work in America. The twin proposals — tighter F-1 visa duration of status limits and a restructuring of the U.S. OPT program — have been labelled a dual threat to international student visa policy by universities and immigration experts alike.
The proposed foreign students U.S. visa changes would restrict how long students can stay in the country and modify how long they can work after graduation, potentially reshaping America’s higher-education appeal and competitiveness.
The Two-Pronged “Dual Threat” Explained
The first reform targets the F-1 visa duration of status, which currently allows students to remain in the U.S. as long as they maintain active enrollment in an accredited institution. DHS now seeks to replace this open-ended rule with a fixed four-year stay limit, forcing students to reapply or exit the country if their program exceeds that period.
Officials say this change aims to reduce overstays and tighten immigration oversight. However, critics argue that it creates unnecessary disruption for graduate students, especially in research-intensive programs that naturally take longer to complete.
The second part of the overhaul — dubbed the U.S. OPT program overhaul — involves altering post-graduation work permissions under Optional Practical Training (OPT). Currently, OPT allows eligible students to work in the U.S. for up to 12 months (or 36 months for STEM graduates). Under the new proposal, the government would reclassify OPT work authorizations and potentially remove key tax exemptions, increasing costs for both employers and students.
Together, these measures form what observers describe as a “dual threat international student visa U.S.” scenario — reducing the U.S.’s attractiveness as a destination for skilled global talent.
Impact of Fixed Stay Limits on Students
If adopted, the international students U.S. stay limits proposal would mean most students must leave or apply for extensions at the end of a four-year term. Those from countries with higher visa-overstay rates — including India, China, and several African nations — could face even shorter stays of two years.
Under current policy, an F-1 visa remains valid as long as the student maintains lawful academic progress. The proposed shift to fixed-duration visas would introduce greater uncertainty, especially for PhD students and those in dual-degree programs.
Universities say this could cause administrative chaos and force thousands of legitimate students to re-apply for visas mid-degree. “This policy would effectively punish students for pursuing longer or research-based programs,” said an immigration adviser at Stanford University.
OPT Work Program Faces New Restrictions
The U.S. OPT program overhaul adds another layer of concern. The Department of Homeland Security is reportedly considering mandatory FICA tax deductions for OPT participants, who are currently exempt under student-status rules.
This would mean international students — and their employers — must pay payroll taxes even during temporary post-study training, cutting net income for students by 7–8%.
In addition, DHS could introduce stricter U.S. student visa work rules, requiring employers to verify that OPT roles directly relate to the student’s field of study. Violations might lead to employer penalties or loss of student work authorization.
These changes, experts warn, would make OPT less attractive to both companies and graduates. “It’s already challenging for foreign students to transition to full-time employment. Adding more red tape could drive talent elsewhere,” said NAFSA’s executive director, Esther Brimmer.
Universities and Business Leaders Push Back
Major universities, industry associations, and business groups have condemned the proposals. In a joint statement, the Association of American Universities (AAU) and U.S. Chamber of Commerce said that restricting student visas and post-study work will harm the nation’s research ecosystem.
They pointed out that international students contribute over $40 billion annually to the U.S. economy, sustain hundreds of thousands of jobs, and play vital roles in innovation sectors such as technology and healthcare.
Business leaders argue that the U.S. should be encouraging — not discouraging — global talent amid global competition from countries like Canada, Australia, and the U.K., all of which have liberalised their post-study work systems.
Government Justification and Political Context
The DHS insists that the reforms are necessary for “national security and system integrity.” Officials argue that some students misuse the duration-of-status provision to overstay visas or take unauthorized employment.
Supporters within Congress say the overhaul will tighten immigration loopholes and ensure only genuine students stay for study purposes.
However, critics see the timing as politically driven. With the 2026 midterms approaching, immigration has re-emerged as a divisive issue. Analysts suggest that these foreign students U.S. visa changes reflect broader domestic pressure to demonstrate tougher control over visa categories — even those tied to education and research.
How Students Will Be Affected
If finalized, the proposals would directly impact nearly 1.1 million international students in the U.S. as of 2025. Key changes include:
- Fixed four-year stay limit instead of “duration of status.”
- Shorter grace period (30 days instead of 60) to leave or adjust visa status.
- Mandatory re-application for visa extensions beyond the initial stay.
- Potential loss of FICA tax exemption under OPT.
- More stringent documentation to prove employment relevance under U.S. student visa work rules.
Many Indian and Chinese students—who together represent over 50% of the U.S.’s foreign student population—would be disproportionately affected.
Global Ripple Effects
The global education market is already reacting. Canadian and Australian universities report increased inquiries from students who fear instability in the U.S. visa environment. Recruiters predict a potential 20–30% drop in U.S. applications if these changes proceed.
Such an outcome could reverse decades of American dominance in international higher education and damage universities that rely heavily on international tuition.
Next Steps: Comment Period and Potential Legal Challenges
The DHS proposals are currently in the public comment phase. Advocacy groups like NAFSA, ACLU, and the American Council on Education (ACE) are preparing formal objections. Legal experts also anticipate court challenges if the final rule restricts due process or violates academic freedom principles.
Observers expect months of debate before final implementation. Meanwhile, universities are advising students to maintain valid status, keep documentation updated, and prepare for possible rule changes by early 2026.
Source:
